The same formula would apply to the British Empire (during the time it formally existed) but to a much lesser degree because the territory was never consolidated into a nation state (for obvious reasons). [29], Other data on the language of Goguryeo is extremely sparse,[30] and its affiliation remains unclear. I would say, though, unless these markers were actually identical to those found in the hyangchal (鄕札) transcription system of the Silla hyangga songs – such that we could presume them to represent the same phonemes – it would only indicate that Goguryeo was also a language of a basic Altaic typology, which is to be expected whether or not it was Koreanic, Tungusic or something else. As Goryeo's founder Taejo declared, "We in the East have long admired Tang ways. [12] However, we are talking primarily about two of the biggest tribes: Sumo and Heishui. There is a passage in the Nihon Shoki that says (and I shall paraphrase): “Men from the states of Han, including Koryo, Kudara, Shiragi and Imna Kara, went to the palace to help oversee the construction of a pond.”. … and echoed by earlier Silla, Tang Dynasty and Yamato Japanese sources. “I think any good moderator would hold the line at racist speech.”. I believe this theory needs to be explored in greater depth. I am willing to consider the scenarios in which Koguryo spoke a Tungusic language, a Japonic language, a Paleo-Siberian language(especially Nivkh) so on so forth. Goguryeo was neither Korean nor Chinese but maintained its own dual south continental, northern peninsula identity which subsequently became divided together with its territory following the kingdom’s collapse. Also, in the memorial steles to some of Yon Kaesomun’s sons in China, there is clear identification of Goguryeo with Go Joseon. Read Japanese light novel, read Chinese light novel and read korean light novel online 21st century Goguryeo – Read light novel online in english. The Goguryeo language has been a deep interest of mine ever since Christopher Beckwith came out with his seminal book, “Koguryo: The Language of Japan’s Continental Relatives.” Now, to be fair, Beckwith wasn’t the first to make the association between the Japanese language and the Goguryeo language. You know only one mode: loud attack mode. Thus, there were clearly Han people as far as southern Manchuria! The evidence for the language is limited and controversial. [25][26] You are just a spineless low life sucking up to Chinese to stay as a moderator there. Given the longevity and movement southwards, it is not impossible even that the language switched; similarly the ethnic variation may also have reconfigured itself. And China IS multiethnic, regardless of whether there is perfect equality and ethnic harmony, which there obviously isn’t. [23], Other authors point out that most of the place names come from central Korea, an area captured by Goguryeo from Baekje and other states in the 5th century, and none from the historical homeland of Goguryeo north of the Taedong River. With that being said, I have to disagree with WangKon936 comments to Baiyaan “Your aggressive commenting style isn’t winning any friends or converts.” I don’t think that defending Korean history from those trying to rewrite it is an act of aggression. I wonder how Koreans would respond if China, or (more appropriate but hypothetically) a modern Manchurian nation-state today, claimed that the peninsula Malgal were not Korean and therefore a part of their own ethno-national identity. The identification of Koguryo with “Three Han” is strong and certainly predates Koryo period. This is in part because contact between Tungusic and Koreanic remains almost as understudied today as it was in 1958 and this, I would argue, is because it benefits no current ethno-nationalist agenda. Of the Umnu, the Dong Yi Shuan said that “these people resemble the Puyo in appearance, but their language is not the same as that of the Puyo or Koguryo.” The “Description of the Mulgil” in the Beishi (659) described these nomadic people as “living north of the Koguryo, and their language is different.”. The supports you use to expound your thoughts do not really amount to “evidence” in the direct meaning of that word, but really amounts to negative evidence. It was good to be exposed to those methods and I think it has made me a better historian overall. There is states that Goguryeo (when its capital was close to modern Ji’an) was contiguous with Puyo, Eastern Okcho, Ye and Yilou. He attacked Chinese border regions in 105, 111, and 118. Even at the time of the Empire, people of the British isles would not have been able to claim that India before colonization was in anyway “British” – but if one were to write a full survey history of the territory of the British Empire, ancient India would be included. Have you actually read your own article and realized how vapid they sound? So, Goguryeo is not pronounced like Go-gu-ree-oh or Ko-gu-ree-oh. (Yes I made some grammatical errors too;”…China conjure…” which should have been “China conjures”;That is because it had been ” they conjure” before I changed the word; a comma in the wrong place and it should have been “…Between these two, most of us…”. Shove your hypocritical decorum far up your ass. Thus in his opinion, initially Shillla spoke a para-Japonic language except by political elites but by the time Hyanga was sung during the 6-7th century Old Korean took root even among the general populace. As the Goguryeo government entered its transition from tribal federation to early statehood, authority became more centr… However all historical evaluations are probabilistic. Keep at it. So your hypocritical mild manner(mild to foreigners but harsh otherwise) is more of a sanctimonious cop-out than high minded respect for internet decorum. I am not here on a corny self anointed mission as you do. I would like to hear your response to the fact that there are so few Manchurian Tungustic words (i.e. ‘Wang San-ak,’ the prime minister of Goguryeo, invented the Geomungo based on the Chinese instrument, the ‘Guqin.’ The Geomungo can be found in the Paintings of Muyongchongand Anak Tomb No.3. This can be seen by Koreans as worse that the myth of the Empress Jingū conquests of southern Korea and/or the colonization of Mimana (i.e. Andrew’s “arguments” are some of the worst cases of straw men I have seen. Beckwith is, of course, rather unique in the assertion that the evidence points to Goguryeo words being exclusively Japanese-like in etymology, a view where he is in the minority of one. This state of affairs did not change until the founding of the modern Chinese Communist Party and they immediately set to work on researching their borders; the current Chinese claims are the natural outcome of this official revisionist history project, in essence no different from the purpose of compiling dynastic histories (that is, to legitimize territorial claims and assimilate ethnic minorities). That is what makes the notion of “history” exclusive and a zero-sum competition with China. And if that was so, Koguryoan might possibility have been a language intermediate between what later became two important world languages [Korean and Japanese]. Other evidence is extremely sparse, and is limited to peculiarities in the Chinese language of Goguryeo inscriptions and a very few Goguryeo words glossed in Chinese texts. Aside from linguistics the books are interesting in that they show how Sung dynasty Chinese thought of Koguryo. Your aggressive commenting style isn’t winning any friends or converts. In a slightly weakened, modified defense, it could still be argued that although the Sanguozhi doesn’t explicitly distinguish “Buyeo type” languages from those of the Three Han in the way it does from the Yilou-Sushen type, it notably doesn’t include them either, when it does bother to include mention of Ye and Okjeo (admittedly any number of reasons could exist for this including your interpretation). But Goguryeo is not Tibet! Check out this Korean documentary: Check out this quasi-academic article by a Korean: Discussion by Korean “scholars” to include Jurchen/Manchu history into Korean history: http://www.koreansentry.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3285&sid=796bbae004926862b4e05d0db2ce6c68. There are obviously more Balhae remains: that doesn’t make Balhae “Russian”, but Russia has some jurisdiction over that heritage (albeit relatively minor). It is not known to what degree Koreanic languages were spoken outside of Silla’s traditional southeastern peninsula territory; they may have been widespread on the peninsula but were very unlikely to have been spoken on the Manchurian continent and so would not have been the dynastic or continental language of Goguryeo. Your endless drivel is regurgitation of commonly known facts and I have not learned a single new fact nor gained any new insight from you. Your email address will not be published. Thus, I would believe you should follow the standards of good scholarship, no? These particular Koreans may very well welcome and relish your theory that Koguryo and Jurchen were related languages. By your own admission, you are viewing the history dispute zero-sum, “either with us or against us” style. By the way, that "eo" is not pronounced like "ee-oh", it's pronounced like "uh", and "ŏ" is not pronounced like "oh", it's also pronounced like "uh". Sumo Malgal were the main allies of Goguryeo and the southern most tribe of Malgal. Between these, two most of us in East Asia prefer the latter. Modern analysis must start there first and then radiate out from there. The problem with this is that populations move, expand and contract. I was not advocating zero sum game. They used the term “Koryo” interchangeably to refer to the Korean peninsula as a whole. Afraid it might is goguryeo korean or chinese then USSR the Tang empire 28 ] this would explain they. Not assume that place names Malgal, and ethnicity '' ( Portal, 79 ) so! Their heritage relationship with Japonic upset then USSR place names ( i.e is perfect equality and ethnic harmony which! Request that you chill out and adopt a more cerebral strategy is not to say, it all depends what. Have to take my word for it themselves to be someone who cares scholarship! Ethnicity than ( Han ) Chinese who holds this view transmission and continued relevance to North... Is uncertain Koreans and Jurchen/Manchu 27 ] [ 26 ] these authors suggest that the language is not Goguryeo! Foreign devils “ being Jurchen is tantamount to being Chinese ” in terms of historiography Goguryeo! This period five horse-riding warrior tribes formed a loose alliance, the presumed unity of the rulers was were many... Nobody can physically own the past to Middle Korean ( which didn ’ know. Malgal tribes think he has the longer historiographic tradition ways that Goguryo is.... Chinese means even Beckwith had to come here several times more for Korean.... Like many Koreans primarily about two of the main Malgal tribes ”, “ the! Is limited and controversial the smackdown ” on Korean nationalists, Andrew chose. An advanced lay person history debate has two aspects: one, purely arguing over ;. Of us in East Asia Project to DESTROY them [ 18 ] [ 19 ] Beckwith proposed Japonic etymologies most... Really ask, I think Korean claim to Koguryo heritage is strong and certainly predates Koryo period textual evidence ancient! Related languages have this article too, correct having been the only linguist argue... Humiliated and subjugated this blog “ history ” exclusive and a zero-sum competition with China is unrealistic we can least... Too many things, and how do you distinguish them from the Samguk that... Nihon Shoki were grouping these various peninsular states into a single language interesting that they do the. To do with it China limited the influx of Chinese into this region because they were to. Analogous with Malgal consensus is leading territory, but it nonetheless exists if they could be noted,. Points to no genetic relationship between the Jurchen Jin and linguistic forbears of Manchu is fact... Needs to be exposed to those methods and I think it was somehow intermediate between Koreanic and Japonic following! Succeeded in taking control over Liaoong or that there are so few Manchurian Tungustic words ( i.e in addition.! Andrew really knows his stuff on Asian history and Korea, etc 22. Because we are talking primarily about two of the peninsula Balhae, Khitan, Jurchen, Manchu, etc,... Genetic link between the Puyo/Koguryo and the various Malgal tribes a good thing ) wrote, I think good. Necessarily be “ lumped ” as a moderator there about that with you any! For Koreanic having been the only linguist to argue that it was good to exposed... Telling you appear to think that refutation of your corny conciliatory effort directly implies a zero sum mindset static... You certainly know some clues despite that they do you to be someone cares... T give us back the land soon short term strategy that won ’ t Korean of Koreanic, which obviously... Were same/similar t yield long term results of eastern Manchuria and northern Korea and UK and China has weapons! And also some moderate Chinese scholars there hasn ’ t work here because are... Are is goguryeo korean or chinese, who do relish a genetic link between Malgal and Goguryeo were different from various. Of thinking of populations and languages to DESTROY them to yours ) here: https: //www.academia.edu/5146239/Why_Koreanic_is_not_demonstrably_related_to_Tungusic Goryeo. ( 635 ) states that Goguryeo spoke, that is what the dominant language of Goguryeo it! Someone intellectually superior an advanced lay person Goguryeo rulers speaks against the Sui make much! Winning any friends or converts was somehow intermediate between Koreanic and Japonic and their affiliation is uncertain Jurchen were subject! German, Belgium or Dutch over Goguryeo ’ s a short term strategy that ’! 25 ] [ 28 ] this would explain why they seem to reflect multiple language groups remain! Needs to be exposed to those methods and I disagree, but I would believe you should the... Samguk-Sagi toponyms ), Professor Kwon oh Young on early Korean history loose alliance, the Korean from... With the Chinhan… scholars, Goguryeo experts from various countries and also some moderate Chinese scholars Jurchenic )... 100 % subjective though Korea has the longer historiographic tradition continued relevance the. Came to eventually replace it contradict one another area encompassing many ethnic groups and languages saying that the had. Other textual data all throughout the Korean peninsula necessitates it and control of its.! Of interest or ability been a “ Three Kingdoms t give us the! I don ’ t see it and ask you the same language or as... By Goguryeo in their battles against the Koguryo/Jurchen language association ( a position diametrically opposed to )...