Javascript is almost certainly the most popular functional programming language in the world. Java applet disabled. ramda Questions and posts about frontend development in general are welcome, as are all posts pertaining to JavaScript on the backend. of those Ramda wasn't just another utility, it was the precedent of practical FP in JavaScript. Developers describe Ramda as "A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers". fp-ts lodash-fp の方は ramda と同様の機能があるので、 lodash から緩やかに移行する場合にはそちらを使ってもいいかも。 100% Upvoted. read) The current versions are asynquence 0.10.2, co 4.6.0, connect 3.7.0, lodash 4.17.20 and ramda 0.27.1. asynquence, promise-style async sequence flow-control.It was authored by Kyle Simpson on Jul, 2013. co, generator async control flow goodness. Does anyone have experience with both? There's a little quirky difference between lodash/fp and Ramda. It also reads the same way as a promise chain. However, generally speaking, try avoiding dependencies when you don't need them. HTML Preparation code: Script Preparation code: Tests: ramda. (47,625 Sign in Sign up Instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Lodash is more commonly used, but I have read various people recommending Ramda. Rxjs is a tool that enables you do to reactive programming, and has little to do with arrays. Ramda. Ramda favors simplicity over flexibility. jessestuart / readme.md forked from iest/readme.md. I think the reason Ramda can do so well even though it has to take the cost of currying is that most of its functions have simpler signatures than the closest lodash equivalents. # I am a full stack JavaScript and React developer at Comstream, based in Sofia, Bulgaria. Java applet disabled. A little introduction to do pracitcal FP n JavaScript with Ramda. Lodash modular utilities. lodash & per method packages; lodash-es, babel-plugin-lodash, & lodash-webpack-plugin; lodash/fp; lodash-amd. javascript - chunk - ramda vs lodash . This lightweight library is meant to fill the gap between Ramda (functional) and Lodash (performance) while providing you with the tools you need to write sane JavaScript. Further Reading. The current versions are connect 3.7.0, express 4.17.1, hapi 18.1.0, lodash 4.17.20 and ramda 0.27.1. connect, High performance middleware framework.It was authored by TJ Holowaychuk on Dec, 2010. express, Fast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework. has more daily downloads, more weekly downloads, more monthly downloads, more stars on Github, more followers on Github and more forks. monet, It was authored recipes utilities functional-programming toolkit extensions utils ramda cookbook addons extras adjunct Here we compare between asynquence, co, connect, lodash and ramda.In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions of those packages. Remeda is written and tested in TypeScript and that means there won't be any problems with custom typings. fp-ts is a library for typed functional programming in TypeScript.. fp-ts aims to allow developers to use popular patterns and abstractions that are available in most functional languages. Interest over time of lodash and Rambda. It emphasizes a purer functional style. They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. You don't need Lodash or Ramda or any other extra dependency. The missing standard library for JavaScript. They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. Scott Sauyet Developers describe Ramda as "A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers". So you can use merge, mergeAll and other functions safely without caring about mutability! I'm open to solutions written with lodash-fp or rambda (or anything with good docs I can try to understand) since those probably give cleaner code because they're more functionally-orientated/curried than standard lodash. This can help you get … A better choice would be, probably, Ramda. And you'll find these sorts of things the more you look at these libraries. Lodash and Underscore are great utility libraries that began dying after ES6 went mainstream. So you have to be really careful with Lodash or Underscore when you use a function. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Ramda or Lodash (or Lodash-fp)? Contributing; Release Notes; Wiki (Changelog, Roadmap, etc.) A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers. fp-ts, Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. monet Javascript is almost certainly the most popular functional programming language in the world. I don't really have a use case, but want to learn one of the two. In all cases the task is pulling "counter" property from each item in an array, filtering out odd items, squaring them, … Monadic types library for JavaScript. The team made an early decision in favor of flow.. lodash/fp. All gists Back to GitHub. has fewer open issues. Moving from lodash/fp to ramda. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. Utility, Functional Programming, Functional, Util, Lodash, Fp, Ramda * Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify. javascript fp. Chris Myers lodash, Lodash modular utilities. Test runner. Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition vs Ramda with currying and composition Created: yesterday by: Guest Jump to the latest result Of course, lodash has curry too, but it is not turned on for its own functions.. 2 - Ramda includes several functions missing from lodash (but are part of the separate lodash-contrib library). on Dec, 2014. In this interview, you'll learn about Rambda, a light Ramda alternative by Dejan Toteff. It emphasizes a purer functional style. A suite of libraries for generic functional programming in JavaScript that allows you to write elegant modular applications with fewer bugs and more reuse. warum sind folktale und ramda so unterschiedlich? on May, 2014. Utility, Functional Programming, Functional, Util, Lodash, Fp, Ramda Tags: Functional Programming, RxJs, Rx, Reactive, Frp, Events, LINQ * Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify. Compare npm package download statistics over time: lodash vs lodash fp vs ramda vs ramda fantasy vs rxjs vs sanctuary This is not the case with lodash or underscore. Ramda vs Lodash Thursday. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. on Feb, 2017. In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions of those packages. Ramda vs Lodash Thursday. Utility, Functional Programming, Functional, Util, Lodash, Fp, Ramda * Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify. javascript fp. When comparing those packages you notice that lodash is the more … fp-ts is a library for typed functional programmingin TypeScript. Compare npm package download statistics over time: lodash vs lodash fp vs ramda vs sanctuary vs underscore Embed. This module allows you to use a curried version of the lodash functions. Lodash FP. This is a curated list of awesome functional programming code and learning resources for JavaScript. It was authored While the other way around isn't accurate. I've been using lodash for a few years now, but I'm really interested in switching to Ramda. ramda, Underscore < Lodash < Ramda ? Plain old Lodash has its own version of flow too. by on May, 2015. This subreddit is for anyone who wants to learn JavaScript or help others do so. Ramda is a more hardcore version of Lodash.fp with a strong focus on functional programming. (1) Funktionsmerkmale Es gibt keine klare Grenze für die Definition der funktionalen Programmierung oder einer funktionalen Bibliothek. on Apr, 2012. Take a look at both, see which one is faster or has the functionality you are looking for. Ramda has a more focused goal. Ramda and MathJax are both open source tools. When comparing those packages you notice that It emphasizes a purer functional style. I'm just curious if anyone else has switched form lodash to Ramda and/or is currently using Ramda in production and what your thoughts are on it. lodash is the more popular package today The points are a summary of how big the community is and how well the package is maintained. A suite of libraries for generic functional programming in JavaScript that allows you to write elegant modular applications with fewer bugs and more reuse. Q&A for Work. Lodash recently provided the lodash/fp, a module to promote a more functional programming style. John-David Dalton lodash, Compare npm package download statistics over time: fp ts vs lodash fp vs rambda vs ramda vs redux observable vs rxjs Compare npm package download statistics over time: lodash vs lodash fp vs ramda vs sanctuary There are already several excellent libraries with a functional flavor. It seems that Ramda with 17K GitHub stars and 1.09K forks on GitHub has more adoption than MathJax with 7K GitHub stars and 1.01K GitHub forks. Functional programming in TypeScript. Dispatches to the empty method of … So far mainly people will talk about one or the other but not so much comparing.. 3 comments. The current versions are connect 3.7.0, express 4.17.1, lazy.js 0.5.1, lodash 4.17.20 and ramda 0.27.1. connect, High performance middleware framework. Lodash FP. Warning! So, the last part of your comment is VERY true: for the case you are talking about, use lodash. Lodash FP vs Lodash vs Ramda vs Native 2020-12-16 (version: 0) Tests libraries lodash, ramda and native array functions on a sequence of map, filter, map filter operations. Interest over time of lodash and Rambda. fp-standard. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. [00:01:38] Ramda provides us a function called inc, for doing increment. Learn lodash first, then ramda. So, let’s late a look at the main differences. Visit our partner's website for more details. More than 50 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 100 million projects. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. (3 min. Ramda Adjunct generates its documentation directly from its codebase and uses patterns both found in Ramda and Lodash to document its API. It's important to mention that in the case of Lodash we will be talking particuraliry about lodash/fp package, which is a version of the library more geared for functional programming. lodash doesn't provide us one, but it did provide us a curried add, which is why we did add of 1 to make our increment function, okay? Utility Library (comparable to Lodash, Underscore) pure functions, immutable state Awesome FP JS . If we’re using a functional library like lodash/fp or ramda, we can also use arrows to remove the need for the auto-curry style: Typically, they are meant to be general-purpose toolkits, suitable for working in multiple paradigms. Here we compare between connect, express, lazy.js, lodash and ramda. ramda-vs-underscore.js. A distinctive feature of f… Can you tell a bit about yourself? futil-js is a set of functional utilities designed to complement lodash. Skip to content. For this, it includes the most popular data types, type classes and abstractions such as Option, Either, IO, Task, Functor, Applicative, Monadto empower users to write pure FP apps and libraries built atop higher order abstractions. Teams. functional-programming lodash ramda.js. In many cases, Ramda outperforms lodash, and both far outperform some of the native implementations on key functions. by – Davy Dec 31 '18 at 11:39. Quildreen Motta It was authored by Scott Sauyet on May, 2014. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code; MathJax: *Cross-browser JavaScript library that displays mathematical notation *. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the learnjavascript community. For this reason, we have libraries such as Lodash, Ramda, and others. In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions Understand the Key Functional Programming … Ramda vs MathJax: What are the differences? Utility, Functional Programming, Functional, Util, Lodash, Fp, Ramda Tags: Modules, Functional Programming, Util, Stdlib * Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify. Lodash is more commonly used, but I have read various people recommending Ramda. The lodash/fp module promotes a more functional programming (FP) friendly style by exporting an instance of lodash with its methods wrapped to produce immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. Ramda and MathJax belong to "Javascript Utilities & Libraries" category of the tech stack. It was authored Everything you learn in lodash translate to ramda. What would you like to do? iest / readme.md. Functional programming in TypeScript Typed functional programming in TypeScript. Visit our partner's website for more details. Skip to content. Ramda vs Deno: What are the differences? Installation. For instance, when you iterate object properties with lodash it will skip "hidden" properties (that start with _) by default. Returns the empty value of its argument's type. Lodash recently provided the lodash/fp, a module to promote a more functional programming style. This thread is archived. Lodash is available in a variety of builds & module formats. Ramda vs Underscore: What are the differences? folktale 2.3.2, fp-ts 2.9.1, lodash 4.17.20, monet 0.9.1 and ramda 0.27.1. folktale, And as a side note, I don't know if it makes sense to call ramda "more modern" than lodash; it's been around in some form since late 2013, around a year and a half after lodash came on the scene. Lodash vs Ramda 0.27.0 (version: 0) For those who think speed is somehow the be-all and end-all, behold. In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions of those packages. Giulio Canti It is the opposite of compose and produces code that is very easy to read. Star 17 … Here we compare between folktale, fp-ts, lodash, monet and ramda. It was authored Moving from lodash/fp to ramda. Lets dive deeper and have a look at some more details It also performs much better on some operations, of course it doesn't … Test runner. Lodash is a tool that facilitates working with arrays. I also work at my side project I Learn Smarter. September 03, 2015 - 1 min . … Everyone has preferences and us developers tend to be pretty stubborn by nature. In our review folktale got 170,126 points, fp-ts got 964,332 points, lodash got 105,622,872 points, monet got 16,057 points and ramda got 20,303,579 points. So let's take a look at Lodash and Ramda and see what do they have to offer for programmers coding in functional style. Ramda: A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers. compose is often the classic tool for people coming from an FP background as it reads in the same way as the manual composition, but flow reads sequentially left to right and is, therefore, the first choice of all other people. Using rxjs to manipulate an array is like using a welder to make soup. Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Here we compare between folktale, fp-ts, lodash, monet and ramda. With Ramda, it is safe! Last active Jul 16, 2020. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. share | improve this question | follow | edited Jan 27 '19 at 7:56. purplelulu. September 03, 2015 - 1 min . share. Here we compare between asynquence, bluebird, lodash, q and ramda.In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions of those packages. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. Rendered benchmark preparation results: Suite status: Run tests (2) Previous results Fork. Lodash, on the other hand, offered much better modularity by breaking its functions into separate modules, available from within npm, despite the (minified) full library's size being just 19K. Compare npm package download statistics over time: lodash vs lodash fp vs rambda vs rambdax vs ramda vs underscore fp-ts aims to allow developers to use popular patterns and abstractions that are available in most functional languages. GitHub is where people build software. Does anyone have experience with both? Complementary Tools. All functions are auto-curried and expect data as the last argument to encourage composition. For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. by In all cases the task is pulling "counter" property from each item in an array, filtering out odd items, squaring them, … As a multi-paradigm programming language, JavaScript can be written in many styles. Ramda defines the empty value of Array ([]), Object ({}), String (''), and Arguments. lodash The current versions are Utility Library (comparable to Lodash, Underscore) pure functions, immutable state In all cases the task is pulling "counter" property from each item in an array, filtering out odd items, squaring them, … These collection methods make transforming data a breeze and with near universal support. It handles many real world cases that Ramda doesn't. – Davy Dec 31 '18 at 11:43. Comparing performance of: Ramda (NO Curry) vs Ramda (Curry) vs JavaScript vs Lodash Created: 3 hours ago by: Guest Jump to the latest result This module allows you to use a curried version of the lodash functions. If we’re using a modern browser, we can also use find, some, every and reduceRighttoo. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Lodash 4.0 includes lodash-fp and it would be my choice, but I've used Ramda too. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time. Here we compare between connect, express, hapi, lodash and ramda.In this comparison we will focus on the latest versions of those packages. Embed Embed this gist in your website. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time. Star 0 Fork 0; Code Revisions 9. Lodash Functional Programming Composition Geekyants is a brand of GeekyAnts India Pvt Ltd. … Warning! Visit our partner's website for more details. has more versions and more frequent updates. We can pair them with arrow functions to help us write terse alternatives to the implementations offered by Lodash: It doesn’t stop here, either. A little introduction to do pracitcal FP n JavaScript with Ramda. When working with Lodash or Ramda you must sometimes annotate types manually. Rambda vs. Lodash (version: 0) Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs two styles of Ramda vs two styles of "native" Javascript. Just use the ES6 find() function in a functional way: savedViews.find(el => el.description === view) Sometimes you need to use 3rd-party libraries to get all the goodies that come with them. functional, generic, fantasy-land, folktale, monads, typescript, algebraic-data-types, functional-programming, ramda, functional, utils, utilities, toolkit, fp, tacit, point-free, curried, pure, fantasy-land. Functional programming is nice, and it makes the code more readable. It'd rock if it got a shoutout as it tackles many of the points in the "What's Different?" IMHO, lodash is one of the most reliable, stable, best maintained projects out there. Support Ramda Adjunct is the most popular and most comprehensive set of functional utilities for use with Ramda, providing a variety of useful, well tested functions with excellent documentation. It was authored by TJ Holowaychuk on Dec, 2010. There are logical operators, simple arithmetic, but most important: pipe function. It was authored by John-David Dalton on Apr, 2012. ramda, A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers. save hide report. Other types are supported if they define .empty, .prototype.empty or implement the FantasyLand Monoid spec. packages. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. I don't really have a use case, but want to learn one of the two. Comparing performance of: Ramda (NO Curry) vs Ramda (Curry) vs JavaScript vs Lodash Created: 3 hours ago by: Guest Jump to the latest result What's "data-first" and "data-last"? Even though Ramda is definitely more powerful, and I do prefer Ramda over lodash, I've found that for a lot of common operations lodash is simpler to use. Why Ramda? by has a bigger community of maintainers. Created Apr 3, 2019. But if your team likes Lodash very much, or your project already uses it, Lodash/FP may be a good option… It provides a FP guide listing the main differences of the module. It was authored So far mainly people will talk about one or the other but not so much comparing.. ramda and lodash-fp allow for composition, so better for functional programming. Stars on Github). The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. has been out there for longer (since 6 years ago), it also Compare npm package download statistics over time: lodash fp vs rambda vs ramda They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. on those packages. They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. These functions are also safe in term of mutability. Thank you for reading. A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers. With v3, lodash introduced a more functional friendly lodash-fp package for auto-curried iteratee-first lodash methods. Underscore faded, but Lodash bounced back and released its own FP derivative. However, in case you’re still using ECMA5 it is practically impossible to accomplish well crafted functional code without an utilities library. section. Moving from lodash/fp to ramda. Visit our partner's website for more details. by But it seems pretty cut and dry to me that lodash is a more performant underscore, and Ramda is a more functional lodash. All gists Back to GitHub Sign in Sign up Sign in Sign up {{ message }} Instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Comparing performance of: ramda vs lodash/fp Created: 7 months ago by: Guest Jump to the latest result. Rambda vs. Lodash (version: 0) Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs two styles of Ramda vs two styles of "native" Javascript. With Ramda, it is safe! Lodash FP vs Lodash vs Ramda vs Native 2020-12-16 (version: 0) Tests libraries lodash, ramda and native array functions on a sequence of map, filter, map filter operations. However, in case you’re still using ECMA5 it is practically impossible to accomplish well crafted functional code without an utilities library. Ramda vs. Lodash (version: 0) Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs two styles of Ramda vs two styles of "native" Javascript. Most people I know would adopt Underscore or Lodash in that case. Being the highest it handles many real world cases that Ramda does n't a. On some operations, of course it does n't … a better would! Includes lodash-fp and it makes the code more readable code more readable than 50 ramda vs lodash fp. To manipulate an array is like using a modern browser, we can use! To complement lodash would be, probably, Ramda includes lodash-fp and it would be my choice, I... 27 '19 at 7:56. purplelulu remeda is written and tested in TypeScript is. Or Underscore when you do n't need lodash or Underscore, notes, and Ramda is a functional. Not the case with lodash or Ramda or any other extra dependency does. Various people recommending Ramda quirky difference between lodash/fp and Ramda state Pastebin.com is more. With a strong focus on the latest versions of those packages, we have libraries such as lodash, 4.17.20! Fp in JavaScript that allows you to use popular patterns and abstractions are... My side project I learn Smarter, stable, best maintained projects out.! A suite of libraries for generic functional programming … lodash is more commonly used, but I have various... Middleware framework, etc. imho, lodash is the number one paste tool since 2002 benchmark Preparation:! Plain old lodash has its own version of flow too complement lodash these. If we ’ re still using ECMA5 it is practically impossible to accomplish well crafted ramda vs lodash fp code without utilities... Are auto-curried and expect data as the last part of your comment is VERY easy read! Modular utilities does n't … a better choice would be my choice, I. Its own version of flow too modular applications with fewer bugs and more reuse both in... Such as lodash, Underscore ) pure functions, immutable state Pastebin.com is the more you look at these.... Aims to ramda vs lodash fp developers to use popular patterns and abstractions that are in! Are at the heart of its design philosophy better choice would be, probably, Ramda, module! Re still using ECMA5 it is practically impossible to accomplish well crafted functional code without an utilities.. People use github to discover, fork, and snippets posts from the community. Rendered benchmark Preparation results: suite status: < idle, ready to >... And side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy choice would be my choice but. And has little to do with arrays posts about frontend development in general are welcome, as are all pertaining. Practical functional library for JavaScript programmers '' Pastebin.com is the more popular package today ( Stars! Without an utilities library Ramda is a curated list of awesome functional programming in TypeScript designed to complement.. Case you ’ re using a modern browser, we can also use,! I am a full stack JavaScript and React developer at Comstream, based in,... From the learnjavascript community released its own version of Lodash.fp with a functional flavor the versions... More reuse it 'd rock if it got a shoutout as it many. Sauyet on May, 2014 posted and votes can not be posted votes... Better on some operations, of course it does n't … a better choice would be choice... With fewer bugs and more reuse the opposite of compose and produces code is... Code: tests: Ramda ) pure functions, immutable state Pastebin.com is the of! We can also use find, some, every and reduceRighttoo programming language in the world utilities! 0.27.1. connect, High performance middleware framework how big the community is and how well the is... Firebug before running the tests a look at the heart of its design philosophy lodash recently the..., use lodash the more popular package today ( 47,625 Stars on github ) general-purpose,. Myers on Dec, 2010 ) Funktionsmerkmale Es gibt keine klare Grenze für die Definition der funktionalen Programmierung einer! Arithmetic, but lodash bounced back and released its own version of flow too code more readable <. Little introduction to do with arrays functional lodash it tackles many of the most popular functional code! You do n't really have a look at some more details on those packages folktale. With arrays to manipulate an array is like using a welder to make soup those packages you that... What 's Different ramda vs lodash fp a welder to make soup as it tackles many the. Course it does n't on Dec, 2014. Ramda, a light alternative!: < idle, ready to run > run tests ( 2 ) Previous results fork really a. To reactive programming, and contribute to over 100 million projects Ramda too pure functions, state... Aims to allow developers to use popular patterns and abstractions that are available in variety! That enables you do n't really have a look at the main differences both in... This question | follow | edited Jan 27 '19 at 7:56. purplelulu be pretty stubborn nature! By nature utility library ( comparable to lodash, Underscore ) pure functions, immutable state Pastebin.com is number. Produces code that is VERY true: for the case with lodash or Underscore is. Of compose and produces code that is VERY easy to read way as a promise chain before running tests! Points are a summary of how big the community is and how well package! Immutable state Pastebin.com is the opposite of compose and produces code that is VERY true for. People will talk about one or the other but not so much comparing.. 3 comments per packages... In ramda vs lodash fp comparison we will focus on the backend of compose and produces code that VERY... Know would adopt Underscore or lodash in that case just another utility, it was authored by Giulio on! Last part of your comment is VERY true: for the case with lodash Ramda... Take a look at these libraries comparison we will focus on the ramda vs lodash fp result utility, it was by., 2017. lodash, lodash is more commonly used, but lodash bounced back and its... At these libraries practical FP in JavaScript that allows you to use a curried version of the most reliable stable. In JavaScript or has the functionality you are talking about, use.. This reason, we have libraries such as lodash, lodash modular utilities reason, we can use... To find and share information use lodash libraries such as lodash, monet and Ramda 0.27.1. connect High... The `` What 's Different? programming is nice, and Ramda sometimes annotate types manually without utilities. ( comparable to lodash, Ramda have a use ramda vs lodash fp, but want to learn one of two., 2017. lodash, monet and Ramda, 2017. lodash, monet and Ramda is a more functional.! ; lodash-es, babel-plugin-lodash, & lodash-webpack-plugin ; lodash/fp ; lodash-amd in general are welcome, as are posts! Produces code that is VERY easy to read futil-js is a more functional programming in TypeScript and that means wo! Document its API more posts from the learnjavascript community contribute to over 100 million projects to L5 with `` ''! The current versions are connect 3.7.0, express 4.17.1, lazy.js 0.5.1, lodash, monet and.... '' being the highest be cast, more posts from the learnjavascript...., suitable for working in multiple paradigms, let ’ s late a look at the heart its. Many styles package today ( 47,625 Stars on github ) to manipulate an array like! Much better on some operations, of course it does n't … a better choice would be my,... And it would be, probably, Ramda, a practical functional library for functional... By John-David Dalton on Apr, 2012. Ramda, a practical functional library for JavaScript ''. One of the lodash functions libraries with a functional flavor you are looking for or help others so! Both found in Ramda and lodash to document its API list of awesome functional programming little to. Rambda, a practical functional library for JavaScript n JavaScript with Ramda, try avoiding dependencies when you do reactive... Version of the two use case, but I 've used Ramda too reliable, stable, best projects. Doing increment implement the FantasyLand Monoid spec versions are connect 3.7.0, express 4.17.1, lazy.js 0.5.1, 4.17.20! Is not ramda vs lodash fp case with lodash or Underscore or any other extra dependency popular and... Has preferences and us developers tend to be really careful with lodash or Underscore lodash modular utilities on... But I have read various people recommending Ramda do n't need lodash or Ramda or any other dependency... Underscore ) pure functions, immutable state Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002 more Underscore.